Thursday, April 29, 2010

Oliver Stone…. another Hollywood Communists

Now before you say Oh Can’t be….
Everything you are about to read can be found on the net. I have to give credit to David Horowitz for doing the bulk of this work..

Stone was Born in New York City in September 1946, Oliver Stone is one of the world's most prominent movie directors and a vehement critic of American foreign policy, and makes money hand over fist here in America. Stone enrolled at Yale University in 1965 but dropped out after his freshman year. From April 1967 to November 1968, he served as an infantryman in the U.S. Army, where he specifically requested to be assigned to combat duty.After his stint in the military, Stone attended the New York University film school, where he was mentored by the legendary director/producer Martin Scorsese. Stone graduated in 1971 and soon thereafter launched his cinematic career. His first full-length movie was Seizure (1974).By the early 1970s, Stone had developed strong anti-war convictions. Two of his films, Platoon (1986) and Born on the Fourth of July (1989) -- both of which dealt with the Vietnam War -- portrayed the U.S. military as a villainous entity composed disproportionately of men whose dubious morals predisposed them to indiscriminately gun down enemy soldiers and unarmed civilians alike. I have a completely different view of the people that served in Vietnam, I am Veteran of the 25th Infantry Division and never met anyone like the derelict fools he depicts in the movie Platoon. The dishonors he shows the 25th I.D. and all Veterans of that war is Despicable. The movie Born on the Forth of July is about the U.S. Marine Corps. NO HIGHER HONOR THEN A UNITED STATES MARINE. I’ll leave it at that. Much of Stone's work is, like the films cited in the preceding paragraph, unabashedly political in nature. He tackles projects of both historical relevance and fantasy, often addressing the recurring themes of conspiracy, power, greed, violence, and of course war. He uses the medium of film as a political tool, pushing a leftist agenda while expressing his overt contempt for conservatives specifically, and for myriad facets of American culture generally.Stone's historical revisionism is evident in those movies he has made that center on events of the 1960s and 1970s. In his 1991 film JFK, Stone concludes that President Kennedy was killed by conspiring factions of CIA officers, Cuban refugees, Texas oil tycoons, and rogue U.S. military personnel. In his 1995 film Nixon, Stone connects the eponymous President to the assassination of Kennedy. The only other people he did not blame in the movie was Archie Bunker and Beaver Clever.Other Stone-directed movies of the 1990s, including The Doors and Natural Born Killers, explored the themes of excess and drug use -- subjects with which Stone himself was familiar, having been addicted to cocaine in the 1970s.In the wake of 9/11, Stone opined that the terrorist hijackers had acted not as unprovoked aggressors, but rather in retaliation against American arrogance and corporate greed. "I think the revolt of September 11th was about 'F--- you! F--- your order,'" he said. (Deep Thinking here..)Stone also accused the U.S. government of having purposely allowed Osama bin Laden to escape unharmed while pretending to be hot on his trail. "Bin Laden," said Stone, "was completely protected by the oil companies in this country who told [President] Bush not to go after him because it would piss off the Saudis."In 2002 Stone was a signatory to Not In Our Name's "Statement of Conscience," an anti-war declaration whose signers pledged "to resist the [U.S.] policies ... which pose grave dangers to the people of the world." Not In Our Name was a project of the Maoist agitator C. Clark Kissinger and the Revolutionary Communist Party.In 2003 Stone directed Comandante, a documentary study (for HBO television) of Fidel Castro. For the making of this film, Stone was granted thirty hours of interview time with the Cuban dictator, whom he would later describe as someone "[w]e should look to … as one of the Earth's wisest people, one of the people we should consult.” Well now we don’t have to because we have a communist dictator in the white House Now.Comandante portrayed Castro as a sympathetic figure. HBO, however, cancelled the film's scheduled airing in the spring of 2003, after 80 human-rights activists in Cuba had been sentenced to prison terms of 20 years or more -- for speaking out against abuses by the Castro regime.Undeterred, Stone returned to Cuba in May 2003 to film Looking for Fidel, which retained an admiring tone toward Castro. In a television interview following the movie's release, Charlie Rose asked Stone about objections that some critics had raised vis a vis Castro's human-rights violations. Stone replied: "I can't answer the question because, frankly, I don't know the answer…. Human rights is a very, very delicate [concept]. It goes both ways. I mean, there can be those people who are authentically violated and those people who are not, those people who are supported by the United States financially and those who are not." I think our rights are violated when we have to hear this loon speak..Also in 2003, Stone directed Persona Non Grata, a sympathetic documentary (again for HBO) about the Palestinian leader and longtime international terrorist and pedophile, Yasser Arafat. Arafat recently had been placed under house arrest by the Israeli Defense Forces, in retaliation for his repeated failure to discourage Arab terrorism. Stone nonetheless paid a friendly visit to Arafat in the latter's Ramallah compound. While he was in the region, the director also visited with Ramallah's leading Hamas chieftain, Hassan Yussef. Talk about friends in low places.. After the release of Persona Non Grata, Stone explained that he had made the film in order to ask Arafat about his "long-term classical values: what your life was like, what the meaning of your suffering was, what regrets you have.” Some one should have asked how many little boys did he violate. In an interview with famed Hollywood Variety columnist Army Archerd, Stone said that after having made this movie, he now understood why suicide bombers "feel the way they do." "The Israelis have no business in the West Bank," Stone elaborated. "The [Jewish] settlements have to be gotten out of the West Bank." And where did you get you diplomatic credentials from??? In 2003 Stone lent his name to a statement condemning the Smithsonian Institution's plan to exhibit the Enola Gay, the B-29 Superfortress used in the atomic bombing of Hiroshima in 1945. Stone and his fellow 250+ signers -- among whom were Noam Chomsky, Martin Sheen, Norman Lear, and Pete Seeger -- were opposed to the aircraft being regarded in a "celebratory" manner. I guess it doesn’t matter that the dropping of the Atom Bombs SAVED WELL OVER ONE MILLION LIVES. In 2006 Stone released his film World Trade Center, which centered around two Port Authority police officers who became trapped under the rubble of New York's fallen Twin Towers on 9/11. At a press conference connected to the film's premier at the San Sebastian International Film Festival, Stone publicly announced that he was "ashamed for my country." And you though it was just Michelle Oboma, He added: "We [America] have destroyed the world in the name of security ... From September 12 on, the incident was politicized and it has polarized the entire world. It is a shame because it is a waste of energy to see that the entire world five years later is still convulsed in the grip of 9/11. It's a waste of energy away from things that do matter, which is [sic] poverty, death, disease, the planet itself, and fixing things in our own homes rather than fighting wars with others. Mr. Bush has set America back ten years, maybe more ... We did not fight back in the same way that the British fought the IRA or the Spanish government fought the Basques here. Terrorism is a manageable action. It can be lived with." We were a lot safer under Bush, rather then this bowing and bumbling fool, that is trying to be a man, or trying to fill a mans shoes, in the white house.At a Moscow press conference in September 2006, Stone hinted that he might make another film suggesting that the Bush administration had been intimately involved in the planning and execution of 9/11. "There is a great story in a movie, a conspiracy by a group of people in the American administration who have an agenda and who used 9/11 to further that agenda," he told journalists. Stone accused President Bush of exploiting 9/11 to stoke Americans' fear and bolster his own power in a manner that was "right out of George Orwell."In 2008 Stone was one of more than 560 celebrities, scholars, journalists, politicians, and organizations to sign a petition asking the federal government to grant clemency to Leonard Peltier, an American Indian rights activist convicted of murdering two FBI agents in 1975. Among Stone's fellow signatories were Tim Robbins, Susan Sarandon, and the American Friends Service Committee.Stone is also a supporter of Mumia Abu Jamal, a leftist icon and former Black Panther convicted of the 1981 murder of Philadelphia policeman Daniel Faulkner.In a January 2008 interview with The Observer, Stone expressed support for the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC), a Marxist-Leninist guerrilla group designated as a terrorist organization by both the European Union and the United States. Said Stone: Is there a terrorist out there that this clown doesn’t love. "I do think that by the standards of Western civilization they [FARC] go too far; they kidnap innocent people. On the other hand, they're fighting a desperate battle against highly financed, American-supported forces who have been terrorizing the countryside for years and kill most of the people. FARC is fighting back as best it can, and grabbing hostages is the fashion in which they can finance themselves and try to achieve their goals, which are difficult. They're a peasant army; I see them as a Zapata-like army. I think they are heroic to fight for what they believe in and die for it, as was Castro in the hills of Cuba." That same month, Stone collaborated with Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, a FARC sympathizer, in brokering a deal which called for the guerrilla group to release three hostages as a gesture of good faith. Stone described Chavez as "an honest man, a strong man and a soldier." Now if your going to look up to some one as a mentor or a father figure, some one with honor and dignity, It would definitely be a Marxist murdering, violator of human rights like the pig faced Hugo Chavez. NO???!!!! In March 2008 Stone, along with actors Matt Damon and Ben Affleck, was named as a judge in a MoveOn.org advertising contest designed to promote the presidential candidacy of Senator Barack Obama.In October 2008, during the height of the presidential election season, Stone released his film on the life and presidency of George W. Bush, simply titled W. Starring Barbra Streisand's stepson, Josh Brolin, as President Bush, the movie portrays Bush as a petty, profane, religious zealot.Over the years, Stone has made campaign contributions to a number of political candidates, most notably Jesse Jackson, Barbara Boxer, Bill Clinton, John Kerry, Al Gore, Ralph Nader, John Edwards, and Barack Obama.So why do we send our hard earned money to this Holly Wood Communist? He hates us, and our way of life. He hates the United States as a representative republic. He hates capitalism, Stop sending YOUR money to this communist; we can live with out him..

Thursday, April 22, 2010

Constitution? We don't need no stinking Constitution!

The strange thing about the Democratic rank-and-file now is that their Leftist-Liberal leaders have almost comprehensively and completely built-in a fundamental dislike (almost hatred) and distrust of the state and US Constitutions and Declaration of Independence.

How bizarre. If one talks with a typical Democrat these days and particularly the younger ones, they have an almost automatic disdain for the state and federal Constitutions and have virtually no knowledge of them or the principles involved. That is very different from the Democrats I grew up around in the 60s. Today, it is reflected in the zombie-like rhetoric and name-calling about anyone, whether a Republican, Independent, Libertarian or others who profess a love and understanding of the Founding documents and the principles involved. I would think they would understand that this is a very dangerous trend for the long-term survival of their own party IN THIS COUNTRY.

Even if a Democrat is found that openly professes a love (extremely rare) of the Constitution(s) and Declaration, almost none of them have studied in-depth either the state or federal Constitutions or have an understanding of the principles behind the documents. That is a clear reflection of how far their party leadership has moved the rank-and-file away from those principles. Most Democrats don't even seem to understand how those principles were set-up to work at all or why. Rejecting the principles, they have adopted the "living document" fallacy to accomodate the rejection.

It was only a few short decades ago that Democrats were just as likely to profess a love and understanding of the Constitution as any Republican. They understood many of the same principles, just took a slightly different view of them. Now there is virtually nothing in common with those that want to see Constitutional government. How did that happen? Five or six decades ago many Democrats, similar to many Republcans, were still "classic liberals", which is referred to today as a 'libertarian.' It is interesting how time causes such large polarity flips to where the average Democrat of today wouldn't even recognize his counterpart of 60 years ago. He would believe that counterpart to be a Republican! Anyone that needs a fact-check on that should Google and read the National Democratic Platform from 1932 that FDR ran on, then was the first to throw away.

Both major parties have strayed far from their roots and principles. Many Republicans have a long way (some as far as the Dems from another direction) to go to find their way back to the Founding principles. Both parties have precipitated the rise of the TEA Party movement because of it. However, it is clear at this point that the reason that Democrats only comprise 12-17% of TEA Partiers is the success the anti-Constitutionalists have had in the Democratic Party. The average Democrat sees someone who believes in the Constitution and Declaration as someone to fear and loathe. That's something all Democrats need to think about and why more need to flock to the TEA Party movement before it is too late.


Jeff Wright
Vice-Chair, EPC TEA Party
719.646.3395
jwright@timewarp.ws

"The man who lets a leader prescribe his course is a wreck being towed to the scrap heap." - Ayn Rand

Saturday, April 17, 2010

Preaching the party line

Preaching the party line

So one day a man knocks on the door and say's to you we are here in the neighborhood and asking if you would like to have this valve put in you house that is hooked up to our distribution point and if you put this outlet in your house we hook it up for Free, and you will get all these gems, silver, diamonds, gold.....
How could you say no?!?!. So your hooked up and you can't wait to open this thing to get all that was promised, Sure enough when you turn it to the on position all they promised is flowing out, slowly, painfully slow, but it's flowing. You and your family are vigilant at watching for the gems, silver, diamonds, gold, and you are getting it just like they said.Now what they did not tell you, is that for you to get all of this, there has to be a push, or a catalyst to get the stuff moving from the distribution point to your house. Now at first you say so what look what were getting, it's a small inconvenience, nothing to complain about. As time goes on you see less and less treasures and more and more catalyst, and the catalyst is starting to turn color and has a slight odor, But still your getting all this treasures, well years have gone by now and you have to sift through so much catalyst that it's a all over the house and it's really starting to smell badly not to mention the foul content that is coming in also is so bad that the children in the house are not allowed to go near it or handle the stuff, at this point your sifting through so much vile and vulgar trash that you wonder what happened to the treasures. Now you realize that this out let is polluting you and the people you love and your house. YOU turn the valve OFF. That my friends is your Television hooked up to Cable or Satellite.
Lets go back to the time when in the 1950’s there were only five channels on broadcast television and we had to have an antenna on the roof pointed just right to pick up the broadcast..At that time we had some very note worthy shows that would entertain us and in most case would provide the edification of the America and the American way. We learned that telling the truth was always the best thing to do. We were shown that a good neighbor was a blessing to have, and to know for, in some cases thirdly years or more, so much so that they were as close as family,We were shown that treating an animal with respect and to care for it’s well-being had long term rewards of faithfulness and loyalty.Maybe fathers were not always correct, but they were always Dad’s, and Dad’s word was as good as Mom’s, Mom’s word WAS LAW. Mothers were not always the best at everything they did, but they were always the anchor of the family and always Mom. Parents back then had a way of bringing forth a wise and thoughtful answer to the worldly troubles of the children and teens under there roof, and children respected and honored there parents and elders in general. Ok so now you have the idea, I don't have to go no about family values and all that.
Fast forward to today, The American way is vilified, Americans are made out to be arrogant fools, Fathers,, if there is one, will be portrayed as a dumb sexiest, homophobic, greedy, racist, and if the father has the unfortunate curse of being a white male ,,, well he's probably a pedophile and the family is better off with out him any way..
Now the Mother is portrayed as the hard working long suffering, can't get ahead cause of the husband beating her up side the head, because he dropped out of school in the 10th grade because he got her pregnant when he forced him self on her,,,now he has to work to support her and the kid, but can't hold down a job for more that a few months, and can't pass a drug screen. She is held back by him and is seeing her shrink on the side going to some of the worst motels in the next county so not to be seen coming out of a no tell motel... Telling the truth went out the window, and remember that neighbor I told you about, who is like family...well in today's television world he is a peeping tom and is checking out the neighbors 10 year old daughters room when she undressing for bed, and he found out that the wife is playing around with the shrink and is blackmailing her for sex on demand. Now the kids have have a whole new world, they know dad's a dork that can't be trusted and his way of exposing his son to literature is passing down the old copies of hustler..He’s drinking as much or more the the father, before the lunch bell at school, The daughter is in a struggle to find out just who and what she is and at this point has been used and abused by most of the boys on the football team, track, and basketball team. She is very pretty but suffers from low self esteam, want’s to run away from it all... X and Crack are taking the place of food..
So now ask the question now did this happen?? Well the liberals.. and just for the record when I say liberals, I am talking about the collectivest, communalest, socialist, communist…….Do you recall The U.S.S.R. Russian Communist..???
The name is: The United Soviet SOCIALIST Republic.. The communist form of government is Socialism..So now that we covered that.
The socialist communist hate America and all the good that is American, they hate good morals, they hate the family as an instution, They hate God and anything to do with God. They hate prayer and want to do away with all loyalty oaths, like the pledge of alligence to the flag..They hate any thing that is higher or better then the state. They hate the art of class and culture, They hate our free speech, they hate our constitution and see it as a road block and hinderance to there utopia..They break down our cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and television.
Let me make the profound statement that Joe McCarthy WAS RIGHT Hollywood is flooded with communist. So much so that, it looks like another world in make belive town..
This letter is not intended to assuage your worst fears about The Hollywood Communist but will, in most cases, confirm them. I want to share this with you because I frequently talk about how The Hollywood Communist's hirelings, who are legion, are the carrion birds of humanity. I would drop the subject except that if we're to effectively carry out our responsibilities and make a future for ourselves. I plan to restore our righteous rage and singular purpose to prevail over The Hollywood Communist's lethargic, hideous band. This is a choice I have made; your choice is up to you. But let me remind you that The Hollywood Communist's irritable suggestions make all of us pay for its boondoggles. News of this deviousness must spread like wildfire if we are ever to put its lumpish meta narratives to the question.
I want to thank The Hollywood Communist for its treatises. They give me an excellent opportunity to illustrate just how vindictive The Hollywood Communist can be. It is certainly the height of ironies that if you've read this far then you probably either agree with me or are on the way to agreeing with me. The Hollywood Communist has the seeds of its own destruction built right into its unsavory worldview. Yes, I could add that it used twisted and self-contradictory logic to arrive at its conclusion that all minorities are poor, stupid ghetto trash, but I wanted to keep my message simple and direct. I didn't want to distract you from the main thrust of my message, which is that The Hollywood Communist wants to produce an army of mindless insects who will obey its every command.Think about the Lie to me nightly news networks… To produce such an army, it plans to destroy people's minds using either the drugs of TV or an advanced form of lobotomy Movies. Whichever approach it takes, I am intellectually honest enough to admit my own previous ignorance in that matter. I wish only that The Hollywood Communist had the same intellectual honesty.
It would be great if all of us could give the needy a helping hand as opposed to an elbow in the face. In the end, however, money talks and you-know-what walks. Perhaps that truism also explains why I am aware that many people may object to the severity of my language. But is there no cause for severity? Naturally, I warrant that there is because we were put on this planet to be active, to struggle, to work, and to do something good for others. We were not put here to plunge the whole of Christendom into wars and chaos, as The Hollywood Communist might allege. The Hollywood Communist maintains a "Big Brother" dossier of incriminating personal information about everyone it distrusts, to use as a potential career-ruining weapon. Is your name listed in that dossier? I could give you the answer now but it would be more productive for me first to inform you that knowledge and wisdom are The Hollywood Communist's enemies. They understand that by limiting education and enlightenment, it can fool more people into believing that it can succeed without trying. Sadly, those with the least education are those who would benefit most from the knowledge that the things The Hollywood Communists wants to do are unfair, immoral, and if not illegal, Treasonable… I won't dwell on that except to direct your attention to the Pharisaical manner in which they have been trying to turn once-flourishing neighborhoods into zones of violence, decay, and moral disregard.
If The Hollywood Communist's comrades had even an ounce of integrity they would establish clear, justifiable definitions of propagandist and nonrepresentational so that one can defend a decision to take action when The Hollywood Communist's satraps create new (and reinforce existing) prejudices and misconceptions. My vision that some day, people everywhere will deal with The Hollywood Communist's adulterated scribblings on a case-by-case basis is an inspiring dream. Unfortunately, reality always awakens me and reminds me that The Hollywood Communists is addicted to the feeling of power, to the idea of controlling people. Sadly, it has no real concern for the welfare or the destiny of the people it desires to lead and show how to live. The Hollywood Communists contends that we can all live together happily without laws, like the members of some 1960s-style dope-smoking commune. What planet are they from? The planet Brazen? That's the question that perplexes me the most because The Hollywood Communist's dissertations are built on lies and they depend on make-believe for their continuation.
Would all The Hollywood Communists like it if I were bilious and mudslinging, too? I don't think so. The Hollywood Communists, as usual, prove themselves to be inhumane. If you were to ask The Hollywood Communists, they say that they can’t remember challenging all I stand for. Not only do The Hollywood Communists have a very selective memory, but its oppressive causeries can be quite educational. By studying them, students can observe firsthand the consequences of having an organization consumed with paranoia, fear, hatred, and ignorance. I have just enough stomach left to address one last instance of The Hollywood Communist's vindictive imbecility: The Hollywood Communists sincerely believes that it is not only acceptable but indeed desirable to rob Peter to pay Paul. Unfortunately we are the Peter and the Paul that they will steal from..
So after all of this rant… What to do???? What is the one thing that can be taken away from The Hollywood Communist that will hurt and damage the most??? Would you just love to have a hand in putting them in there place, and say if you don’t like it here get the hell out.
Are they always talking about Money, Things, Clout, Life in the lap of luxury, living the good life… Well it takes money to do that.. YOUR MONEY.. They are selling a product that is vile and vulgar, and putting down the very way of life we love…………………. So stop sending YOUR MONEY to them… HOW???!! Stop going to there movies, Stop buying there Music, Stop watching the trash they put on TV. ABOVE ALL stop watching the socialist news networks ie: CNN, ABC, NBC, CBS, MSNBC, These OUT LETS are loosing viewers buy the truck load, now. Just imagine what will happen, When the money stops going in to the pockets of the Hollywood Communist, and they no longer have a voice to push the party line… Americans have done this in the past, when the money stops, people see the light…