US Order To Shutdown Millions Of Christian Websites Shocks World....... Pakalert

A shocking report authored by the office of Russia’s top religious leader Patriarch Kirill I states that this past week the United States ordered over 10 million Christian websites destroyed that they claimed were a “threat” to their National Security and that the American Internet giant Google quickly responded by making them all disappear.

According to this report, Google first came under assault from the US government in June when the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced that they had launched an investigation into the company, a move defended against by top Google executive Amit Singhal who aside from claiming the attacks against them were baseless said, “At Google, we’ve always focused on putting the user first.”

After weeks of unrelenting pressure upon them, however, this past week Google, which had refused to answer the baseless charges against them, caved to the US government and announced that their Chairman, Eric Schmidt, who had previously said the charges against them were nonsense, agreed to testify before a US Senate Committee under threat of subpoena.

On the very same day that Google caved into these US governments demands, this report continues, they then announced that they had blacklisted and banned over 11 million websites that had been registered for free through the co.cc subdomain the world over.  Giving as its reason for this largest in history removal of private websites Google asserted that it had the right to pull the plug on sites if they “see a very large fraction of sites on a specific freehost be spammy or low-quality.”     

Co.cc is the Internet country code top-level domain (ccTLD) for Cocos (Keeling) Islands, an Australian territory. It is administered by VeriSign through a subsidiary company eNIC, which promotes it for international registration as “the next .com”; .cc was originally assigned in October 1997 to eNIC Corporation of Seattle WA by the IANA.

Most important to note about the .cc domain, this report points out, is its being preferred by Churches and Christian organizations around the world as “CC” also happens to be an abbreviation for “Christian Church” or “Catholic Church,” especially in Islamic Nations where due to strict laws against Christianity these free co.cc websites were the only way those belonging to this faith were able to communicate with each other.

In this Patriarch Kirill I report as to the “true reason” for the US ordered government shutdown of millions of Christian websites in Islamic Nations it states is the “fundamental shift” undertaken by the Obama regime to support radical Muslim elements instead of the once secular Arab leaders it once did.

The most crucial US turnaround in this regard happened this past week, and as we can read, in part, as reported by the Front Page Magazine News Service:

“The Obama administration is set to begin formal contacts with the Muslim Brotherhood, a group dedicated in its own words to “eliminating and destroying Western civilization from within, and sabotaging its miserable house.”

This news came in a Reuters report Wednesday, quoting a “senior U.S. official, who spoke on condition of anonymity.” Why this official felt it necessary to speak on condition of anonymity is a mystery, given the fact that Barack Obama has never made a secret of his solicitude for the Muslim Brotherhood. Even though the Brotherhood was still outlawed in Egypt at that time, he made a point of inviting leaders of the group to attend his speech to the Islamic world in Cairo on June 4, 2009.

Not only that. Obama included the leader of a Muslim Brotherhood-linked group that had been named an unindicted co-conspirator in a Hamas terror funding case among the clerics giving a prayer during his inauguration ceremonies: Ingrid Mattson, then-president of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), offered this prayer at the National Cathedral on Obama’s Inauguration Day – despite the fact that ISNA has admitted its ties to the Brotherhood. In fact, so overwhelming is the evidence of ISNA’s involvement with the Brotherhood and Hamas that the previous summer, federal prosecutors had rejected a request from ISNA to remove its unindicted co-conspirator status. Obama even sent his Senior Adviser Valerie Jarrett to be the keynote speaker at ISNA’s national convention in 2009.”

This gravest danger posed by the US ordered destruction of these millions of Christian websites, this report continues, involves the estimated 20 million Coptic Christians now living in Egypt who, should the Muslim Brotherhood gain control, would face the removal from their homes of all of their children so they could be “educated” in Islamic schools as converts to the Muslim faith.

US author Brad O’Leary in his book “America’s War On Christianity” warns that no one should be surprised about these things as many US regimes, including Obama’s, have waged a decades long war against this faith in their attempt to eradicate it from all forms of public expression, even to outlawing school children from even mentioning the words “God,” “Bible,” or “Jesus Christ” under threat of imprisonment.

Even worse, shocking news is now coming from the United States that the Obama regime has ordered that the words “God Bless” and “Jesus Christ” cannot be used even when burying their military dead, and as we can read, in part, as reported by the Christian Post News Service:

“Texas Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison is calling for an investigation into the actions of the Houston National Cemetery director who told pastors and veterans groups to stop using words like “God bless” and “Jesus Christ” during funeral services. Several veterans groups and pastors in the Houston area filed a religious discrimination lawsuit this week, charging that the cemetery’s director, Arleen Ocasio, was censoring prayers and certain religious terms at funerals for veterans.”

Most appalling of all of these things is the vast majority of the American people allowing their once cherished Christian values of home, family and morality to be continued to be stripped away from them with nary a protest as if they have completely forgotten that their religion would have never survived without the countless millions who martyred their lives, including Jesus, so their faith could survive.

To the horrific future lying in store for Christians living in America today should come as no surprise either as prior to his election as President, Obama stated in response to them, “…it’s not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.”

Forgotten by Obama is that those Americans who “cling to their guns and religion” are the exact people that made the Founders of the United States created their Nation for; and though they have survived much since their founding, their silence today as their Nation is allowed to be destroyed shows how truly weak they have become.  And in that weakness lie the seeds of their own destruction, but which they are too ignorant of history to even see as their total destruction looms ever closer.

Palin is right again.

Judge saves 10-year-old from Kathleen Sebelius - the one-woman death panel 

 

By DAN CALABRESE - Palin is right again.
Not that she'll get credit for it, but when Sarah Palin warned of "death panels" resulting from the constructs of ObamaCare, this is exactly what she meant: Someone needs something or they're going to die, and some government bureaucrat who values the systemic ramifications of the matter above all else, gets to decide what will happen.
In this case, DHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius made her decision: She would not intervene to save the life of 10-year-old Sarah Murnaghan, a cystic fibrosis patient from Pennsylvania. Sarah is, as I write this, weeks away from death if she doesn't get a lung transplant. That, you'd think, would serve as a call to action for anyone who might be able to make the transplant happen. But not Kathleen Sebelius, because adults are also waiting for lungs, and the rules say no one under 12 can be prioritized over adults.
Sebelius claimed rules are rules and she had no authority to intervene, despite a letter from several members of Congress asserting that she absolutely does (including two from Pennsylvania). Sebelius did trouble herself to "order a policy review," but she refused to take action to save Sarah's life.
Fortunately, District Court Judge Michael Baylson issued a restraining order prohibiting Sebelius from applying the policy that will block Sarah from getting the lung transplant. CNN reports:

Janet Murnaghan, Sarah's mother, said the family is "thrilled ... literally jumping for joy."

In a written statement, the family added, "We are experiencing many emotions -- relief, happiness, gratitude and, for the first time in months, hope."

Where someone is placed on the adult lung transplant list depends on several factors -- blood type, distance from donor to potential recipient, and a lung allocation score. The score is derived from medical factors like test results and the patient's diagnosis.

Sarah's parents said her score is a 78. Anything above 60 is considered a high score, according to reports published on the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network website.

The Murnaghans had argued that since the number of children's lungs available through organ donation programs is so small, Sarah -- and other pediatric patients like her -- should be added to the list of people waiting for adult lungs, prioritized by severity of their illnesses.

Now let's be clear about exactly what happened here. A policy was put in place by the federal government that said certain people would take priority over others for transplants. When a person proved to be in desperate need of such a transplant - a matter of life and death - a cabinet-level government official refused to intervene, citing the rules, citing limits on her own authority and saying it would take too long at any rate to change the policy.
Lungs are available. A 10-year-old girl needs one or she will die. But a government policy says she can't have one and no one will do anything to set aside or get around the policy so a 10-year-old girl will not die. Or at least no one would until Judge Baylson came along, thank God.
This is the death panel. It is exactly what Palin was talking about. It is not a group of hooded men sitting atop a raised dias, informing unfortunate souls, "You have been selected for death," but it has the exact same effect. The government makes rules to govern the allocation of resources in health care, and the rules leave no room for flexibility when a person's life is on the line and common sense argues that flexibility is absolutely necessary. Only the intervention of this judge, assuming it is allowed to stand, can save this young girl's life - because government has no idea how to stop tripping over its own policies.
By the way, about Sebelius's claim that she couldn't act because she lacks the authority. Two things about that: 1. She doesn't have the authority to shake down the health care industry for money to pay for ObamaCare implementation either, but that's not stopping her. 2. People who believe it is important to make something happen find a way. They make phone calls. They knock on doors. They call in favors. They get done what needs to get done. People who don't really want to help claim they don't have the authority and leave it at that.
We know what Kathleen Sebelius's priorities are. What a despicable woman. Oh, by the way, I don't remember her boss issuing any directive to find a way to help either. Palin has been right about a lot of things.

Very Important Psychology Lesson!!

Psychology 101 - This Is Brilliant!! (Simple truth)


If you start with a cage containing five monkeys and inside the cage, hang a banana on a string from the top and then you place a set of stairs under the banana, before long a monkey will go to the stairs and climb toward the banana.

As soon as he touches the stairs, you spray all the other monkeys with cold water.

After a while another monkey makes an attempt with same result...all the other monkeys are sprayed with cold water.

Pretty soon when another monkey tries to climb the stairs, the other monkeys will try to prevent it.

Now, put the cold water away.

Remove one monkey from the cage and replace it with a new one.

The new monkey sees the banana and attempts to climb the stairs.

To his shock, all of the other monkeys beat the crap out of him. After another attempt and attack, he knows that if he tries to climb the stairs he will be assaulted.

Next, remove another of the original five monkeys, replacing it with a new one.

The newcomer goes to the stairs and is attacked. The previous newcomer takes part in the punishment...... with enthusiasm, because he is now part of the "team".

Then, replace a third original monkey with a new one, followed by the fourth, then the fifth. Every time the newest monkey takes to the stairs, he is attacked.

Now, the monkeys that are beating him up have no idea why they were not permitted to climb the stairs. Neither do they know why they are participating in the beating of the newest monkey.

Finally, having replaced all of the original monkeys, none of the remaining monkeys will have ever been sprayed with cold water. Nevertheless, not one of the monkeys will try to climb the stairway for the banana.

Why, you ask? Because in their minds...that is the way it has always been!

This, my friends, is how Congress operates... and this is why, from time to time: ALL of the monkeys need to be REPLACED AT THE SAME TIME.

Next: The Benghazi Select Committee

By Jed Babbin on 5.13.13 @ 6:10AM

It’s enough to make a reporter yearn for Monica Beach.

Which one of these facts doesn’t belong among the others?
• U.S. Marines are on alert to evacuate remaining Americans from Libya.
• On the night of September 11, 2012, Gregory Hicks, a State Department official stationed in Tripoli, had a telephone conversation at 8 pm Washington time — that’s 2 am Tripoli time — with Hillary Clinton.
• The Obama administration had a private meeting with their press allies on Friday and CBS’s Sharyl Attkisson is reportedly under fire for taking a skeptical approach to the administration’s spin on Benghazi.
• Rep. Darrell Issa’s (R-CA) hearing last week left far too many questions unanswered.
Okay, you got me: it’s a trick question. None of those things doesn’t belong among the others, and all add up to the conclusion Rep. Frank Wolf (R-VA) reached in January. The House needs to pass Wolf’s H. Res. 36 and create a select committee to investigate the terrorist attack on Benghazi that took four American lives.
Wolf’s point is simply that the conflicting priorities of congressional committees make the Select Committee the only practicable way to get at the truth. As he pointed out in his letter last Friday to Speaker Boehner, Wolf’s bill is now supported by nearly two-thirds of the Republicans in the House, 139 co-sponsors.
Will Boehner have the guts to pass Wolf’s bill? He should, for a host of reasons both substantive and political. In a Friday editorial the Wall Street Journal wrote, “Across this country’s history, the murder of an American ambassador, the nation’s representative, has been taken as not merely a tragedy but an attack on U.S. interests that demands an official accounting to the American people.” With the Journal providing cover for him, Boehner has no excuse to not pass it.
That the Marines are on alert to evacuate the remaining Americans in Libya should be the last stake in the heart of Obama’s “Arab Spring” policy. From Libya to Syria (and Yemen and Iraq and Mali and in so many other places), Obama has worked hard to create a political fiction: that democracy is blooming where it cannot — wherever Islamic law prevails — and al Qaeda is dying among its flowers. Instead, we see terrorist groups fighting among themselves for dominance in too many places. Too many places in which we have lost our ability to influence events.
Which leaves us with the other facts at hand. We know a lot of the questions that still need to be answered, thanks to Wolf’s letter and Andy McCarthy’s usual great work. For example, McCarthy points out here that the Hicks-Clinton telephone call was probably recorded. If that recording (still) exists, it should be turned over to the House and Hillary’s involvement in dealing with the terrorist attack — or not doing so — should be fully investigated.
As should be so many other aspects of this scandal. Another example is the CIA talking points that White House flack Jay Carney claimed were the basis for Amb. Susan Rice’s falsehoods on the September 16, 2012 Sunday talk shows. Carney said, on November 28, 2012, that “Those talking points originated from the intelligence community. They reflect the IC’s best assessments of what they thought had happened. The White House and the State Department have made clear that the single adjustment that was made to those talking points by either of those two institutions were changing the word ‘consulate’ to ‘diplomatic facility’ because ‘consulate’ was inaccurate.”
Which was absolutely false. Moreover, it’s pretty clear that the CIA’s talking points were mangled beyond recognition — at least twelve versions exist according to ABC News — yet the CIA and the intelligence community were blamed for what they and Susan Rice said. The talking points were changed for a reason, and that reason had to be political.
Political as in re-electing Obama. Everything points to the president. His involvement and the involvement of his cabinet and personal staff have to be investigated.
The most interesting part of this is that the White House is feeling sufficient heat on Benghazi to call in the Obamamedia’s most faithful, including CBS News President David Rhodes. (Rhodes’s brother — Ben — is the White House Deputy National Security Advisor for Strategic Communication and reportedly played a major role in changing the CIA talking points.) If, as it appears, the White House is trying to censor Sharyl Attkisson, the alarm bells are ringing all around. Not in the media: they’re Obama’s captives. The desperation alarms are ringing in the White House. They have to bury the Benghazi story before it buries Obama’s presidency.
And they might succeed. Issa’s hearings won’t go on forever and the Benghazi story may only survive in the conservative media. But not if Boehner passes Frank Wolf’s bill and creates the select committee.
What the White House obviously understands is that if Boehner has the courage to do that, there won’t be any way for Obama to escape the Benghazi story between now and the 2014 election. No matter what he does, no matter what he says, as a matter of reflex the media’s attention will return to the select committee’s dealings.
The select committee would, under Wolf’s bill, have the power to subpoena witnesses and documents. So who’s getting subpoenaed this week? Is Obama resisting the document subpoenas? Has he claimed executive privilege yet? What did Hillary’s spokeswoman, Victoria Nuland, say in her deposition? It’s easy to see that creating a select committee could have one overriding effect: the White House should be as tied up with it as Congress was with Obamacare. Our politicians spent about eighteen months on that without a break.
Some of us remember the good old days on Monica Beach. That’s when reporters staked out Ken Starr’s grand jury proceedings in the broad concrete courtyard in front of the U.S. District Court, which became known by that name. There will be enough “process crimes” — lies to congressional investigators that breed lies to grand juries — in any Select Committee’s investigation to keep the Obama administration reeling through 2016.
One of the big reasons that the White House will be tied up is that their friends in the liberal media — especially the crazies on MSNBC and their ilk — are so scared of the Benghazi story that they can’t resist covering it. It may go so far — as one radio talk show host predicted last week — that they would try to cover the Benghazi select committee, even if only to lampoon it, sooner than the rest out of fear of the damage it could cause Obama.
And that’s all politics, the fun side of what we do. The substance of politics is policy, and Obama’s needs to be laid bare to the public.
It would not be beyond the purview of the Benghazi Select Committee to investigate just what Amb. Chris Stevens was doing in Benghazi the night he was killed. What policy purpose was there in exposing him to terrorist attack? Was there some goal that Obama or Hillary was trying to reach?
What was the purpose of the separate mission being conducted by the two former SEALs who were killed the same night? There are so many rumors floating around about what they were doing that a new category of intelligence info had to be created just for it by a friend of mine. He calls it “rumint.” We’ve heard about “MANPADs” — man portable air defense missiles they may have been trying to round up lest they fall into the hands of terrorists. Were they successful? How did their actions further our policy in Libya?
There is every reason for us to be skeptical of Obama’s goals, motivations, and policy. And, given the attention span of the Congress and its committees, there is no prospect that the truth about Benghazi will ever be determined unless Boehner creates the Benghazi Select Committee. The truth still matters. Let’s get this done.http://spectator.org/archives/2013/05/13/next-the-benghazi-select-commi

Obama Holds Secret Benghazi Press Conference, Invites Only Liberals

• 
  

AUTHOR Warner Todd Huston

When Barack Obama came to office he promised to have “the most transparent administration in history.” Apparently that isn’t working out so well, at least not with Benghazi. Last week the administration held secret, off-the-record meetings with the press likely to strong arm them into aiding in the Benghazi cover-up.
After last week’s dramatic testimony on Obama’s failures in Benghazi the off-record nature of the meetings raised a lot of eyebrows, certainly. One has to wonder what Obama is hiding? He keeps claiming that there is nothing to worry about with his conduct during the attacks on our embassy personnel in Libya that horrible day. So, if he isn’t worried, why the secretive meetings with his lapdogs in the press?htthttp://www.mrconservative.com/2013/05/15224-obama-holds-secret-benghazi-press-conference/p://youtu.be/9oHjiSCJAm8                                                                                         Could the edited talking points be one thing the 
Obama admin doesn’t want well known?
After the briefing was reported as off-record, some in the Obama administration even wanted to spin that and mischaracterize it as “on deep background,” instead of off the record. What is the difference between the two? According to Politico that means reporters can use the info they heard but cannot attribute the quote to anyone.
In other words, nothing from the meeting will be reported because good journalistic practice means identifying key sources. Just saying “some say,” or “sources confide” is not optimal, though it is done.
Who can blame Obama for trying to staunch the flow of his administration’s political blood, though. With one group already filing lawsuits against him for his failed leadership in Benghazi and Congress calling this the worst cover-up since anyone can remember, Obama is beginning to panic. But, he’ll likely be able to rely on the Old Media establishment to come to his aide as always… hence the secret meetinghttp://www.mrconservative.com/2013/05/15224-obama-holds-secret-benghazi-press-conference/http://youtu.be/9oHjiSCJAm8

INTERESTING FACTS CONCERNING THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION:

Professor Joseph Olson of Hamline University School of Law , St. Paul , Minnesota , points out some INTERESTING FACTS CONCERNING THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION:
Number of States won by:
Democrats: 19 Republicans: 29
Square miles of land won by:
Democrats: 580,000 Republicans: 2,427,000
Population of counties won by:
Democrats: 127 Million Republicans: 143 million
Murder rate per 100,000 residents in counties won by:
Democrats: 13.2 Republicans: 2.1
Professor Olson adds: "In aggregate, the map of the territory Republicans won was mostly the land owned by the taxpaying citizens of the country.
Democrat territory mostly encompassed those citizens living in government-owned tenements and living off various forms of government welfare...."
Olson believes the United States is now somewhere between the "complacency and apathy" phase of Professor Tyler ' s definition of democracy, with some forty percent of the nation ' s population already having reached the "governmental dependency" phase.

If Congress grants amnesty and citizenship to twenty million criminal invaders called illegals and they vote, then we can say goodbye to the USA in fewer than five years.

IF YOU ARE IN FAVOR OF THIS, BY ALL MEANS, DON'T SHARE.

IF YOU ARE NOT then SHARE IT to help everyone realize just how much is at stake, knowing that apathy is the greatest danger to our freedom.

DO YOU KNOW WHAT MARTIAL IS??????

My Edited Video

Martial law is the imposition of military rule by military authorities over designated regions on an emergency basis.

Martial law is usually imposed on a temporary basis when the civilian government or civilian authorities fail to function effectively (e.g., maintain order and security, or provide essential services), when there are extensive riots and protests, or when the disobedience of the law becomes widespread.

In most of the cases, military forces are deployed to subdue the crowds, to secure government buildings and key or sensitive locations, and to maintain order.[1] Generally, military personnel replace civil authorities and perform some or all of their functions. In full-scale martial law, the highest-ranking military officer would take over, or be installed, as the military governor or as head of the government, thus removing all power from the previous executive, legislative, and judicial branches of government.[1]

Martial law can be used by governments to enforce their rule over the public. Such incidents may occur after a coup d'état (such as Thailand in 2006); when threatened by popular protest (China, Tiananmen Square protests of 1989); to suppress political opposition (Poland in 1981); to stabilize insurrections or perceived insurrections (Canada, The October Crisis of 1970). Martial law may be declared in cases of major natural disasters, however most countries use a different legal construct, such as a state of emergency.

Martial law has also been imposed during conflicts and in cases of occupations, where the absence of any other civil government provides for an unstable population. Examples of this form of military rule include post World War II reconstruction in Germany and Japan as well as the southern reconstruction following the U.S. Civil War.

Typically, the imposition of martial law accompanies curfews, the suspension of civil law, civil rights, habeas corpus, and the application or extension of military law or military justice to civilians. Civilians defying martial law may be subjected to military tribunal (court-martial).